Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263206AbVCDXIQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2005 18:08:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263278AbVCDWQ7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2005 17:16:59 -0500 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.192]:61846 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263045AbVCDU6w (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:58:52 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=MKTn8lZh1d8jgJJeGNKD1kBe4oDnGnxDCoj20e+/XXz1bdZhs7j8sYN3Qeuuup5wJKByIX4LB8G0mhxy6SRE9lbq0YY1XO0A/h1mTh1ExTZ9tclh79qeIrV1FEjT+1yXZpJKBJTF9EN6pTn9bvrd4XnlUeJlbpgMfuUoTS+sWYc= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:58:43 -0500 From: George Georgalis Reply-To: George Georgalis To: Jeff Garzik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: problem with linux 2.6.11 and sa In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050303184605.GB1061@ixeon.local> <20050304043706.GA10336@havoc.gtf.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1462 Lines: 36 On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:53:50 -0500, George Georgalis wrote: > On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 23:37:06 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 01:57:28PM -0500, George Georgalis wrote: > > > I recall a problem a while back with a pipe from > > > /proc/kmsg that was sent by root to a program with a > > > user uid. The fix was to run the logging program as > > > root. Has that protected pipe method been extended > > > since 2.6.8.1? > > > > > > I'm very defiantly seeing a problem with the 2.6.11 > > > kernel and my spamassassin setup. However, it's not > > > clear exactly where the problem is, seems like sa > > > but it might be 2.6.11 with daemontools + qmail + > > > QMAIL_QUEUE. > > > > Does reverting to 2.6.10 fix this behavior? > > Yes, actually I revert to 2.6.8.1; will try 2.6.10 today... I did make oldconfig (n,n,n) with my 2.6.11 .config and seems to be working normal. Could CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL=y have anything to do with it? http://galis.org/linux-2.6.11-sta.config http://galis.org/linux-2.6.10-sta.conf // George -- George Georgalis, systems architect, administrator Linux BSD IXOYE http://galis.org/george/ cell:646-331-2027 mailto:george@galis.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/