Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263370AbVCEAg2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2005 19:36:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263438AbVCEAGk (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2005 19:06:40 -0500 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:2828 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263401AbVCDXEZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2005 18:04:25 -0500 Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 23:04:21 +0000 From: Russell King To: Andrew Morton Cc: rpurdie@rpsys.net, davej@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering Message-ID: <20050304230421.C16178@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Morton , rpurdie@rpsys.net, davej@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20050302203812.092f80a0.akpm@osdl.org> <20050304105247.B3932@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20050304032632.0a729d11.akpm@osdl.org> <20050304113626.E3932@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <01ef01c520b7$94bebf80$0f01a8c0@max> <20050304132535.A9133@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <039001c520e0$4ea3fbe0$0f01a8c0@max> <20050304142219.1e7ecfee.akpm@osdl.org> <20050304222719.B16178@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20050304144808.75357ba3.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20050304144808.75357ba3.akpm@osdl.org>; from akpm@osdl.org on Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:48:08PM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1111 Lines: 29 On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:48:08PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Russell King wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:22:19PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > That's now eight architectures I'll compile-test mm kernels on. > > > > Cool, but please check whether this produces an error: > > > > echo "mov r0, #foo" | arm-linux-as -o /dev/null - > > > > you should get: > > {standard input}: Assembler messages: > > {standard input}:1: Error: undefined symbol foo used as an immediate value > > I did get that. Great - this will help ensure that any breakage due to that binutils problem should get caught relatively quickly no matter how it gets in to either your or Linus' kernel. This is a definite plus. Thanks. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/