Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:08:17 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chrisw@osdl.org, torvalds@osdl.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.11.1
Message-ID: <20050304220817.GD1201@kroah.com>
References: <20050304175302.GA29289@kroah.com> <20050304124431.676fd7cf.akpm@osdl.org> <20050304205842.GA32232@kroah.com> <20050304131537.7039ca10.akpm@osdl.org> <20050304214309.GA898@kroah.com> <20050304135402.268e3865.akpm@osdl.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050304135402.268e3865.akpm@osdl.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1293
Lines: 33

On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 01:54:02PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 01:15:37PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Here's the list of things which we might choose to put into 2.6.11.2.  I was
> > > >  > planning on sending them in for 2.6.12 when that was going to be
> > > >  > errata-only.
> > > > 
> > > >  Ok, care to forward them on?
> > > 
> > > Sure.  How do they get to Linus?
> > 
> > Hm, either he pulls them from our new 2.6.x.y tree, or they go to him
> > through you.  Either way, I'd recommend sending them to him for now,
> 
> We can do that.  As long as the patches remain unaltered I assume that BK
> will recognise that the patch is already there, in a different cset?

Yes, it can handle such a merge just fine.

> > until we get this whole "procedure" worked out.
> 
> Yup.  That's why I'm running this little experiment.  Applying stimuli and
> seeing how we respond.  Yum, cheese.

/me scampers off into the corner...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/