Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263208AbVCDXnL (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2005 18:43:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263353AbVCDXem (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2005 18:34:42 -0500 Received: from smartmx-07.inode.at ([213.229.60.39]:11735 "EHLO smartmx-07.inode.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263155AbVCDVTU (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:19:20 -0500 Message-ID: <4228D0D9.9010301@inode.info> Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 22:19:21 +0100 From: Richard Fuchs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050105 Debian/1.7.5-1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Mackall CC: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: slab corruption in skb allocs References: <42283093.7040405@inode.info> <20050304035309.1da7774e.akpm@osdl.org> <42285354.5090900@inode.info> <20050304201153.GR3163@waste.org> In-Reply-To: <20050304201153.GR3163@waste.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2778 Lines: 95 _correction_ to my previous mail, this does _not_ happen with the eepro100 driver. (sorry for the confusion, i got the kernel images mixed up with all the testing i've been doing.) could this affect the e1000 driver as well? Matt Mackall wrote: > Send the output of ethtool, please. box 1, affected: Settings for eth0: Supported ports: [ TP MII ] Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full Supports auto-negotiation: Yes Advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes Speed: 100Mb/s Duplex: Full Port: MII PHYAD: 1 Transceiver: internal Auto-negotiation: on Current message level: 0x000020c1 (8385) Link detected: yes box 2, affected: Supported ports: [ TP MII ] Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full Supports auto-negotiation: Yes Advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes Speed: 100Mb/s Duplex: Full Port: MII PHYAD: 1 Transceiver: internal Auto-negotiation: on Supports Wake-on: g Wake-on: g Current message level: 0x00000007 (7) Link detected: yes box 3, not affected: Supported ports: [ TP MII ] Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full Supports auto-negotiation: Yes Advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes Speed: 100Mb/s Duplex: Full Port: MII PHYAD: 1 Transceiver: internal Auto-negotiation: on Supports Wake-on: g Wake-on: g Current message level: 0x00000007 (7) Link detected: yes > This tends to be checksum > offloading not working as it should or the like. Can you repeat this > with bulk ssh traffic? yes, with various strange effects: Received disconnect from 195.58.172.154: 2: Bad packet length 919251405. or Received disconnect from 195.58.172.154: 2: Corrupted MAC on input. cheers richard - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/