Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261955AbVCEF0W (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Mar 2005 00:26:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261863AbVCEFPy (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Mar 2005 00:15:54 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:10968 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263486AbVCEFJM (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Mar 2005 00:09:12 -0500 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ian Pilcher Subject: Re: [RFQ] Rules for accepting patches into the linux-releases tree Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 23:08:55 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20050304222146.GA1686@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-0-215-208.client.comcast.net User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041127) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <20050304222146.GA1686@kroah.com> X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Gmane-MailScanner-SpamScore: s X-MailScanner-From: glk-linux-kernel@m.gmane.org X-MailScanner-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 646 Lines: 10 Greg KH wrote: > Anything else anyone can think of? Any objections to any of these? > I based them off of Linus's original list. Must already be in Linus tree (i.e. 2.6.X+1)? -- ======================================================================== Ian Pilcher i.pilcher@comcast.net ======================================================================== - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/