Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263199AbVCEGbs (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Mar 2005 01:31:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263000AbVCEG0o (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Mar 2005 01:26:44 -0500 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:32141 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263085AbVCEGWw (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Mar 2005 01:22:52 -0500 Message-ID: <42294D7D.60509@osdl.org> Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 22:11:09 -0800 From: "Randy.Dunlap" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shawn Starr CC: Greg K-H , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFQ] Rules for accepting patches into the linux-releases tree References: <11099685952869@kroah.com> <200503050057.44233.shawn.starr@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: <200503050057.44233.shawn.starr@rogers.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1629 Lines: 49 Shawn Starr wrote: > How does this fit into Rusty's trivial patch bot? This process will fold that > into a formal method now? > > Shawn. Nope, no comparison or interaction really. x.y (linux-release) isn't meant for trivial patches at all, whereas trivial isn't meant for critical patches either. > >>List: linux-kernel >>Subject: [RFQ] Rules for accepting patches into the linux-releases tree >>From: Greg KH >>Date: 2005-03-04 22:21:46 >>Message-ID: <20050304222146.GA1686 () kroah ! com> >>[Download message RAW] >> >>Anything else anyone can think of? Any objections to any of these? >>I based them off of Linus's original list. >> >>thanks, >> >>greg k-h >> >>------ >> >>Rules on what kind of patches are accepted, and what ones are not, into >>the "linux-release" tree. >> >> - It can not bigger than 100 lines, with context. >> - It must fix only one thing. >> - It must fix a real bug that bothers people (not a, "This could be a >> problem..." type thing.) >> - It must fix a problem that causes a build error (but not for things >> marked CONFIG_BROKEN), an oops, a hang, or a real security issue. >> - No "theoretical race condition" issues, unless an explanation of how >> the race can be exploited. >> - It can not contain any "trivial" fixes in it (spelling changes, >> whitespace cleanups, etc.) -- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/