Message-Id: <200503050819.j258Ju2R016461@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
To: Ian Pilcher <i.pilcher@comcast.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFQ] Rules for accepting patches into the linux-releases tree 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 04 Mar 2005 23:08:55 CST."
             <d0bejc$r11$1@sea.gmane.org> 
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
References: <20050304222146.GA1686@kroah.com>
            <d0bejc$r11$1@sea.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1110010792_5543P";
	 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 03:19:52 -0500
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1116
Lines: 33

--==_Exmh_1110010792_5543P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 23:08:55 CST, Ian Pilcher said:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > Anything else anyone can think of?  Any objections to any of these?
> > I based them off of Linus's original list.
> 
> Must already be in Linus tree (i.e. 2.6.X+1)?

Not workable.  There's a high probability that we hit a bug where Linus
commits a more extensive "correct" solution, but 2.6.X.1 includes a much
simpler band-aid that's technically bogus, but stops a panic-on-boot bug
from manifesting.

--==_Exmh_1110010792_5543P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001

iD8DBQFCKWuocC3lWbTT17ARAv5fAJ0V7e2XBWEogoJSa/nh4rJHfdG2zgCeKqA/
7UZr4p9R/FEtqcG+KtyMYJ4=
=4tsO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_1110010792_5543P--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/