Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262729AbVCEJ6R (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Mar 2005 04:58:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262939AbVCEJ6R (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Mar 2005 04:58:17 -0500 Received: from pils.us-lot.org ([212.67.207.13]:4371 "EHLO pils.us-lot.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262844AbVCEJ6G (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Mar 2005 04:58:06 -0500 To: Greg KH Cc: Chris Wright , torvalds@osdl.org, Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFQ] Rules for accepting patches into the linux-releases tree References: <20050304222146.GA1686@kroah.com> From: Adam Sampson Organization: Things I did not know at first I learned by doing twice. Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 09:58:00 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20050304222146.GA1686@kroah.com> (Greg KH's message of "Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:21:46 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 577 Lines: 15 Greg KH writes: > - It must fix a problem that causes a build error (but not for things > marked CONFIG_BROKEN), an oops, a hang, or a real security issue. So a trivial patch that fixed a data corruption issue wouldn't be accepted? -- Adam Sampson - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/