From: Ed Tomlinson <tomlins@cam.org>
Organization: me
To: Ian Pilcher <i.pilcher@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [RFQ] Rules for accepting patches into the linux-releases tree
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 07:39:26 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20050304222146.GA1686@kroah.com> <d0bejc$r11$1@sea.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <d0bejc$r11$1@sea.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200503050739.26651.tomlins@cam.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 588
Lines: 16

On Saturday 05 March 2005 00:08, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > Anything else anyone can think of?  Any objections to any of these?
> > I based them off of Linus's original list.
> 
> Must already be in Linus tree (i.e. 2.6.X+1)?

How about must be logicily fixed in the Linus tree - Linus does not have to have the 
same patch...

Ed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/