Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261701AbVCERtN (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Mar 2005 12:49:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261697AbVCERqB (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Mar 2005 12:46:01 -0500 Received: from 64-85-47-3.ip.van.radiant.net ([64.85.47.3]:12818 "EHLO vlinkmail") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261701AbVCERnd (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Mar 2005 12:43:33 -0500 Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 09:42:48 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Adam Sampson Cc: Chris Wright , torvalds@osdl.org, Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFQ] Rules for accepting patches into the linux-releases tree Message-ID: <20050305174248.GD13104@kroah.com> References: <20050304222146.GA1686@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 628 Lines: 19 On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:58:00AM +0000, Adam Sampson wrote: > Greg KH writes: > > > - It must fix a problem that causes a build error (but not for things > > marked CONFIG_BROKEN), an oops, a hang, or a real security issue. > > So a trivial patch that fixed a data corruption issue wouldn't be > accepted? Good point, I've now added that. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/