Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:15:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:15:18 -0400 Received: from [194.213.32.142] ([194.213.32.142]:4868 "EHLO bug.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:15:11 -0400 Message-ID: <20010710010505.C557@bug.ucw.cz> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 01:05:05 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Linus Torvalds , Helge Hafting Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Acpi] Re: ACPI fundamental locking problems In-Reply-To: <3B442354.BCA61010@idb.hist.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93i In-Reply-To: ; from Linus Torvalds on Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 08:17:04AM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > But please don't make initrd mandatory for those of us who don't > > need ACPI, don't need dhcp before mounting disks and so on. > > You would never even know the difference. You'd do a "make bzImage", and > the default filesystem would just be embedded into the image. By default > it probably doesn't need to do much - although things like the BIOS DPMI > scan etc would surely be good to get rid of. > > Why complain about that? I'm afraid it will make bzImage way bigger. And making bzImage build dependend on libc is not nice... Or are you going with "userspace but no libc" way? That would solve size, but such userspace is... well.. not too different from kernel space ;-). Pavel -- I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care." Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/