Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261362AbVCFLWS (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Mar 2005 06:22:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261375AbVCFLWS (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Mar 2005 06:22:18 -0500 Received: from mail.dif.dk ([193.138.115.101]:46557 "EHLO mail.dif.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261362AbVCFLWQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Mar 2005 06:22:16 -0500 Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 12:23:19 +0100 (CET) From: Jesper Juhl To: Greg KH Cc: Chris Wright , torvalds@osdl.org, Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFQ] Rules for accepting patches into the linux-releases tree In-Reply-To: <20050304222146.GA1686@kroah.com> Message-ID: References: <20050304222146.GA1686@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 741 Lines: 20 On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Greg KH wrote: > Anything else anyone can think of? Any objections to any of these? > I based them off of Linus's original list. > How about feature regressions? What made me think of this is the thread about the 8x0 alsa breakage in 2.6.11. 2.6.10 and 2.6.9 worked well for people, but 2.6.11 is aparently broken for some. When that bug gets fixed would such a fix be appropriate for 2.6.10.y (assuming it doesn't violate any of your other guidelines) ? -- Jesper - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/