Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 01:22:06 -0800
From: "Barry K. Nathan" <barryn@pobox.com>
To: Stefan Seyfried <seife@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       barryn@pobox.com, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [Bug 4298] swsusp fails to suspend if CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is   also enabled
Message-ID: <20050307092206.GB5083@ip68-4-98-123.oc.oc.cox.net>
References: <20050306030852.23eb59db.akpm@osdl.org> <20050306225730.GA1414@elf.ucw.cz> <20050306195954.6d13cff9.akpm@osdl.org> <422C0A6B.1060700@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <422C0A6B.1060700@suse.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 960
Lines: 23

On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:01:47AM +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
[snip]
> > Isn't some Kconfig solution appropriate here?
> 
> Yes, but only for the CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC case, it does not solve the
> "cpu has no PSE" case for VIA CPUs. So the Kconfig solution is an extra
> bonus.

Note that I've posted a Kconfig solution here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=111017249931972&w=2

Regarding Pavel's patch, it seems to me that it might be better to print
the message at boot time, instead of (or in addition to?) his patch.
Maybe we should be disabling swsusp altogether at boot in that case, if
that's not unreasonably hard to implement.

-Barry K. Nathan <barryn@pobox.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/