Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 10:35:12 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: "Barry K. Nathan" <barryn@pobox.com>
Cc: Stefan Seyfried <seife@suse.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 4298] swsusp fails to suspend if CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is   also enabled
Message-ID: <20050307093512.GE8311@elf.ucw.cz>
References: <20050306030852.23eb59db.akpm@osdl.org> <20050306225730.GA1414@elf.ucw.cz> <20050306195954.6d13cff9.akpm@osdl.org> <422C0A6B.1060700@suse.de> <20050307092206.GB5083@ip68-4-98-123.oc.oc.cox.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050307092206.GB5083@ip68-4-98-123.oc.oc.cox.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1123
Lines: 27

Hi!

> > > Isn't some Kconfig solution appropriate here?
> > 
> > Yes, but only for the CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC case, it does not solve the
> > "cpu has no PSE" case for VIA CPUs. So the Kconfig solution is an extra
> > bonus.
> 
> Note that I've posted a Kconfig solution here:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=111017249931972&w=2
> 
> Regarding Pavel's patch, it seems to me that it might be better to print
> the message at boot time, instead of (or in addition to?) his patch.
> Maybe we should be disabling swsusp altogether at boot in that case, if
> that's not unreasonably hard to implement.

Hmm, yes, that would certainly be better. It would need new
per-architecture hook... Feel free to implement it.
								Pavel
-- 
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/