Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 10:12:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 10:12:21 -0400 Received: from ns.caldera.de ([212.34.180.1]:16840 "EHLO ns.caldera.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 10:12:17 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 16:12:00 +0200 Message-Id: <200107101412.f6AEC0W06951@ns.caldera.de> From: Christoph Hellwig To: cw@f00f.org (Chris Wedgwood) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com Subject: Re: How many pentium-3 processors does SMP support? X-Newsgroups: caldera.lists.linux.kernel In-Reply-To: <20010711015128.E31799@weta.f00f.org> User-Agent: tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.2 (i686)) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article <20010711015128.E31799@weta.f00f.org> you wrote: > On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 10:34:24PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > It supports up to 32, if you can find a machine that has that > many. > > I think 8-way is about as high as anything common goes to, maybe > 16. The cpu array is declared 32 long, maybe this should be changed to > 8 by default? Why limit the user? There are more than enough Linux system that have more than 32 CPUs (SGI, DEC, Sun). Making it a per-architecture value or even a config option make a lot more sense. Christoph -- Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/