Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261776AbVCHIZK (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2005 03:25:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261870AbVCHIZK (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2005 03:25:10 -0500 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.193]:31689 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261776AbVCHIZE (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2005 03:25:04 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=MPrTTKwqbrVPSrPyJa/JegkWK7VCbtfF89AYMv5Es/Nm2pM5Ya3bvB3z/zdtNCyDIMhw8z6oPOVRS8HybM9IxLyAhflnVP/abIWY8kp9WrMK2x5XNrZM1NonGl4KlpAgXmnvvbROm4eDZNhb+akQDi+RPE5+mPewriKkh53dUOo= Message-ID: <58cb370e0503080024adfea23@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 09:24:28 +0100 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Reply-To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] unexport complete_all Cc: mike@waychison.com, bunk@stusta.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <58cb370e050304051424b29c3d@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <422817C3.2010307@waychison.com> <58cb370e0503040240314120ea@mail.gmail.com> <20050304031504.4ea49f83.akpm@osdl.org> <58cb370e050304051424b29c3d@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1557 Lines: 38 On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:14:39 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 03:15:04 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > > > Andrew, what is the policy for adding exports for out of tree GPL code? > > > > > > > There isn't one. Such things cause way too much email. > > Lack of policy causes the same thing (ie. this thread). > > > What complete_all() does is to permit more than one task to wait on a > > completion and for all those tasks to be woken by a single complete(). > > Without it you'd need to record how many tasks are sleeping there and do > > complete() that many times. > > > > So it's a sensible part of the completion API from a regularity-of-the-API > > This function was already part of in-kernel API, just wasn't exported > for modules because there were no in-kernel users. > > > POV. We use it in the coredump code and I don't think we'd be likely to want > > to rip it out. It was my misunderstanding w.r.t. 'We' here... > OK, I understand that the unwritten policy is the following: > symbols for out-of-tree code used by OSDL are fine. 8) /me takes this bad joke back and says sorry to Andrew > > In fact, I'd say that complete() should have always done it this way... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/