Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261423AbVCHRUD (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2005 12:20:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261426AbVCHRUC (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2005 12:20:02 -0500 Received: from sta.galis.org ([66.250.170.210]:59016 "HELO sta.galis.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261423AbVCHRTy (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2005 12:19:54 -0500 From: "George Georgalis" Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, users@spamassassin.apache.org, misc@list.smarden.org, supervision@list.skarnet.org, nix@esperi.org.uk, mkettler@evi-inc.com Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 12:19:53 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, users@spamassassin.apache.org, misc@list.smarden.org, supervision@list.skarnet.org, nix@esperi.org.uk, mkettler@evi-inc.com Subject: Re: a problem with linux 2.6.11 and sa Message-ID: <20050308171953.GB1936@ixeon.local> References: <20050303214023.GD1251@ixeon.local> <6.2.1.2.0.20050303165334.038f32a0@192.168.50.2> <20050303224616.GA1428@ixeon.local> <871xaqb6o0.fsf@amaterasu.srvr.nix> <20050308165814.GA1936@ixeon.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050308165814.GA1936@ixeon.local> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1509 Lines: 37 On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:58:14AM -0500, George Georgalis wrote: >On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 01:37:03PM +0000, Nix wrote: >>On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, George Georgalis uttered the following: >>> I recall a problem a while back with a pipe from >>> /proc/kmsg that was sent by root to a program with a >>> user uid. The fix was to run the logging program as >>> root. Has that protected pipe method been extended >>> since 2.6.8.1? >> >>The entire implementation of pipes has been radically revised between >>2.6.10 and 2.6.11: see, e.g., and >>. >> >>Bugs have been spotted in this area in 2.6.10: this may be >>another one. > >Thanks, my issue is clearly between 2.6.10 and 2.6.11; though I won't be >able to drill down anything more specific, for a while. The links >do look relevant but I cannot say for sure. My last post didn't actually describe what the problem is, which is spamassassin always scores 0/0 under 2.6.11 but functions properly (scoring x/5) under 2.6.10. More details are in the thread of this post. http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/3/3/513 // George -- George Georgalis, systems architect, administrator Linux BSD IXOYE http://galis.org/george/ cell:646-331-2027 mailto:george@galis.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/