Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261287AbVCIIGu (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 03:06:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261346AbVCIIGu (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 03:06:50 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:2789 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261287AbVCIIGr (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 03:06:47 -0500 Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE][PATCH 2.6.11 2/3] megaraid_sas: Announcing new mod ule for LSI Logic's SAS based MegaRAID controllers From: Arjan van de Ven To: "Bagalkote, Sreenivas" Cc: "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" , "'linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org'" , "'James Bottomley'" , "'Matt_Domsch@Dell.com'" , Andrew Morton , "'Christoph Hellwig'" In-Reply-To: <0E3FA95632D6D047BA649F95DAB60E570230CC18@exa-atlanta> References: <0E3FA95632D6D047BA649F95DAB60E570230CC18@exa-atlanta> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 09:06:38 +0100 Message-Id: <1110355598.6280.61.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 4.1 (++++) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 2.63 on pentafluge.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (4.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO 1.1 RCVD_IN_DSBL RBL: Received via a relay in list.dsbl.org [] 2.5 RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK RBL: Sent directly from dynamic IP address [80.57.133.107 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS RBL: SORBS: sender is listed in SORBS [80.57.133.107 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 877 Lines: 22 On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 18:08 -0500, Bagalkote, Sreenivas wrote: > > I will make this an instance parameter if the idea to reduce as many > global variables as possible. But if the objection is because each > adapter > may have different value for variable, then it is indeed a global > value. > "is_dma64" - which is computed using the size of dma_addr_t - is > telling > something about the kernel rather than the controller feature. > then having it as variable sounds really really wrong; the size of dma_addr_t is a compile time property... (and why do you care about it? you see high dma addresses when they come in, right?) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/