Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262290AbVCIKds (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 05:33:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262271AbVCIKak (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 05:30:40 -0500 Received: from smtp.dei.uc.pt ([193.137.203.228]:27563 "EHLO smtp.dei.uc.pt") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262283AbVCIK3a (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 05:29:30 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 10:28:32 +0000 (WET) From: "Marcos D. Marado Torres" To: Dominik Karall cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Greg KH , Linux Kernel Development , chrisw@osdl.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.11.2 In-Reply-To: <200503091121.16801.dominik.karall@gmx.net> Message-ID: References: <20050309083923.GA20461@kroah.com> <200503091121.16801.dominik.karall@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-UC-FCT-DEI-MailScanner-Information: Please contact helpdesk@dei.uc.pt for more information X-UC-FCT-DEI-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: marado@student.dei.uc.pt Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1848 Lines: 50 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Dominik Karall wrote: >>>> which is a patch against the 2.6.11.1 release. If consensus arrives >>>> that this patch should be against the 2.6.11 tree, it will be done that >>>> way in the future. >>> >>> IMHO it sould be against 2.6.11 and not 2.6.11.1, like -rc's that are'nt >>> againt >>> the last -rc but against 2.6.x. >> >> It's a stable release, not a pre/rc, so against 2.6.11.1 sounds most >> logical to me. > > I don't think so. The latest patch (2.6.11.2 now) is on the frontpage of > kernel.org, so IMHO the user should not need to search the kernel.org/pub > archives to get 2.6.11.1 patch before he can start working with 2.6.11.2. > > I think it's a small problem too, that 2.6.11 source isn't directly accessable > through the kernel.org frontpage while there is no "full tarball" of 2.6.11.X > trees. With that "full tarball" for 2.6.11.X the issues would be over. I think there should be one. Marado - -- /* *********************************************************** */ Marcos Daniel Marado Torres AKA Mind Booster Noori http://student.dei.uc.pt/~marado - marado@magicbrain.biz () Join the ASCII ribbon campaign against HTML e-mail and /\ Microsoft attachments. They endanger the World. /* *********************************************************** */ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iD8DBQFCLs/gmNlq8m+oD34RAnu6AJwOvkvet1kLLGzLQ5EGuiVxtNbeEQCg7Ar9 Stnv4wmM74a5mX3fFrAh34Y= =fCVH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/