Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262286AbVCISyg (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 13:54:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262163AbVCISyg (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 13:54:36 -0500 Received: from c-67-163-99-44.client.comcast.net ([67.163.99.44]:33934 "EHLO leaper.linuxtx.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262128AbVCISxc (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 13:53:32 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 12:53:31 -0600 From: "Justin M. Forbes" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: 2.6.Stable and EXTRAVERSION Message-ID: <20050309185331.GB19306@linuxtx.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 822 Lines: 17 With the new stable series kernels, the .x versioning is being added to EXTRAVERSION. This has traditionally been a space for local modification. I know several distributions are using EXTRAVERSION for build numbers, platform and assorted other information to differentiate their kernel releases. I would propose that the new stable series kernels move the .x version information somewhere more official. I certainly do not mind throwing together a patch to support DOTVERSION or what ever people want to call it. Is anyone opposed to such a change? Thanks, Justin M. Forbes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/