Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262374AbVCITLu (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 14:11:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262373AbVCITLr (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 14:11:47 -0500 Received: from pastinakel.tue.nl ([131.155.2.7]:9234 "EHLO pastinakel.tue.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262338AbVCITJc (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 14:09:32 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 20:09:20 +0100 From: Andries Brouwer To: Alan Cox Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , torvalds@osdl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove dead cyrix/centaur mtrr init code Message-ID: <20050309190920.GA4044@pclin040.win.tue.nl> References: <200503081937.j28Jb4Vd020597@hera.kernel.org> <1110387326.28860.199.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1110387326.28860.199.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-Spam-DCC: : Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1011 Lines: 30 On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:55:27PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > [PATCH] remove dead cyrix/centaur mtrr init code > > This patch was discussed previously and declared incorrect. The ->init > method call is missing in the base mtrr code. > > Should be reverted and/or fixed properly. Hi Alan - a surprising reaction. The patch is an improvement - it #ifdef's out some dead code. I sent you a follow-up patch that activates the dead code, since you said I have one here running 2.4 still. I can test a 2.6 fix for the mtrr init happily enough. But so far you have not replied. The moment you report that the follow-up patch is fine, we can remove the #if 0 and insert the initcalls instead. So, all is well today, and we are waiting for your report. Andries - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/