Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262454AbVCIU6f (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 15:58:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262458AbVCIUzr (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 15:55:47 -0500 Received: from grendel.digitalservice.pl ([217.67.200.140]:47245 "HELO mail.digitalservice.pl") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262153AbVCIUnF (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 15:43:05 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Jason Lunz Subject: Re: PATCH: 2.6.11-ac2 Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 21:45:38 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, webmaster@kernel.org References: <1110392991.3072.222.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200503092145.38436.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1021 Lines: 28 On Wednesday, 9 of March 2005 20:31, Jason Lunz wrote: > davidsen@tmr.com said: > > You know what would be really useful... if www.kernel.org listed the > > "latest -ac" patch as something current instead of 2.6.10-ac12, which was > > a great patch in its day, but hasn't been current for a while. > > > > In fairness, the -mm is out of date, too. Perhaps a bit of automation > > would be appropriate here, so that no one would have to update this > > manually. > > I could have sworn it showed 2.6.11-ac1 for a while. Maybe the 2.6.11.2 > stuff broke it somehow? Surely it did. Greets, Rafael -- - Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here? - That depends a good deal on where you want to get to. -- Lewis Carroll "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/