Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262450AbVCIVlC (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:41:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262449AbVCIViJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:38:09 -0500 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:31190 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262487AbVCIVhH (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:37:07 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 13:36:55 -0800 From: Chris Wright To: DHollenbeck Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.x.y gatekeeper discipline Message-ID: <20050309213655.GY28536@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> References: <422F66C6.50208@softplc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <422F66C6.50208@softplc.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 976 Lines: 28 * DHollenbeck (dick@softplc.com) wrote: > [PATCH] drivers/net/via-rhine.c: make a variable static const > > This patch makes a needlessly global variable static const. > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk > Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik > > ---------------------------------- > > It's possible I simply don't get it, but the above description of a > patch hardly seems like it would qualify for the intentions of the > 2.6.x.y series. I think you've confused something. This patch is not in -stable. Here's current listing: http://linux-release.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6.11/ChangeSet@1.2079..1.2085 thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/