Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S262372AbVCIV3W@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S262372AbVCIV3W (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:29:22 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262472AbVCIVYk
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:24:40 -0500
Received: from animx.eu.org ([216.98.75.249]:53152 "EHLO animx.eu.org")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262473AbVCIVVH (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:21:07 -0500
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:26:30 -0500
From: Wakko Warner <wakko@animx.eu.org>
To: "Marcos D. Marado Torres" <marado@student.dei.uc.pt>
Cc: Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.11.2
Message-ID: <20050309212630.GB24278@animx.eu.org>
Mail-Followup-To: "Marcos D. Marado Torres" <marado@student.dei.uc.pt>,
	Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20050309083923.GA20461@kroah.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503090950200.7496@student.dei.uc.pt> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0503091104180.22598@numbat.sonytel.be> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503091014580.7496@student.dei.uc.pt>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503091014580.7496@student.dei.uc.pt>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1276
Lines: 37

Marcos D. Marado Torres wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> 
> >>>which is a patch against the 2.6.11.1 release.  If consensus arrives
> >>>that this patch should be against the 2.6.11 tree, it will be done that
> >>>way in the future.
> >>
> >>IMHO it sould be against 2.6.11 and not 2.6.11.1, like -rc's that are'nt
> >>againt
> >>the last -rc but against 2.6.x.
> >
> >It's a stable release, not a pre/rc, so against 2.6.11.1 sounds most 
> >logical to
> >me.
> 
> Well, yes, _if_ 2.6.12 patch is going to be to aply against 2.6.11.last 
> instead
> of 2.6.11. And, well, either one will cause great panic for hose who aren't 
> and
> the mailing lists and just visit kernel.org to downoad the latest stuff.

<mode="enduser">
IMHO, as long as 2.6.12 patches against 2.6.11, I'm cool with 2.6.11.2
patching against 2.6.11.1, but I think it should patch against 2.6.11
instead
</mode>

-- 
 Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/