Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262550AbVCIXFE (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 18:05:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262508AbVCIXCd (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 18:02:33 -0500 Received: from gate.in-addr.de ([212.8.193.158]:46048 "EHLO mx.in-addr.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262093AbVCIWVE (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 17:21:04 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 23:21:14 +0100 From: Lars Marowsky-Bree To: Alex Aizman , Matt Mackall Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE 0/6] Open-iSCSI High-Performance Initiator for Linux Message-ID: <20050309222114.GF4105@marowsky-bree.de> References: <422BFCB2.6080309@yahoo.com> <20050309050434.GT3163@waste.org> <422E8EEB.7090209@yahoo.com> <20050309060544.GW3120@waste.org> <422E96D9.6090202@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <422E96D9.6090202@yahoo.com> X-Ctuhulu: HASTUR User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1776 Lines: 44 On 2005-03-08T22:25:29, Alex Aizman wrote: > There's (or at least was up until today) an ongoing discussion on our > mailing list at http://groups-beta.google.com/group/open-iscsi. The > short and long of it: the problem can be solved, and it will. Couple > simple things we already do: mlockall() to keep the daemon un-swapped, > and also looking into potential dependency created by syslog (there's > one for 2.4 kernel, not sure if this is an issue for 2.6). BTW, to get around the very same issues, heartbeat does much the same: lock itself into memory, reserve a couple of pages more to spare on stack & heap, run at soft-realtime priority. syslog(), however, sucks. We went down the path of using our non-blocking IPC library to have all our various components log to ha_logd, which then logs to syslog() or writes to disk or wherever. That works well in our current development series, and if you want to share code, you can either rip it off (Open Source, we love ya ;) or we can spin off these parts into a sub-package for you to depend on... > The sfnet is a learning experience; it is by no means a proof that it > cannot be done. I'd also argue that it MUST be done, because the current way of "Oh, it's somehow related to block stuff, must be in kernel" leads down to hell. We better figure out good ways around it ;-) Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Br?e -- High Availability & Clustering SUSE Labs, Research and Development SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/