Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262420AbVCJIRw (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2005 03:17:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262444AbVCJIRv (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2005 03:17:51 -0500 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:51903 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262420AbVCJIQ6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2005 03:16:58 -0500 Subject: Re: [patch 11/16] Solaris nfsacl workaround From: Andreas Gruenbacher To: Trond Myklebust Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Neil Brown , Olaf Kirch , "Andries E. Brouwer" , Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <1110412619.10804.51.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> References: <20050227152243.083308000@blunzn.suse.de> <20050227152353.510432000@blunzn.suse.de> <1110412619.10804.51.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: SUSE Labs Message-Id: <1110442616.25570.2.camel@winden.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:16:57 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1596 Lines: 36 On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 00:56, Trond Myklebust wrote: > su den 27.02.2005 Klokka 16:22 (+0100) skreiv Andreas Gruenbacher: > > vanlig tekstdokument vedlegg (nfsacl-solaris-nfsacl-workaround.patch) > > If the nfs_acl program is available, Solaris clients expect both version > > 2 and version 3 to be available; RPC_PROG_MISMATCH leads to a mount > > failure. Fake RPC_PROG_UNAVAIL when asked for nfs_acl version 2. > > > > Trond has rejected this patch. I'm not sure how to deal with it in a > > truly clean way, so probably I won't care and still use this as a vendor > > patch. > > So I've talked to the Solaris implementors about this issue. They said > that the above behaviour on their clients was a bug that they've > corrected in Solaris 10. Thanks for gathering this piece of information. > Given that very few people are going to be using Solaris clients with > NFSv2 against a Linux server, and given that there is always the option > of compiling the server without NFSACL support for those few who need to > do this, I suggest we just drop this patch. It's NFSv3 clients that exhibit the strange behavior; else I never would have run into this bug. For me it's okay to leave out this patch; we'll still carry it around in our vendor tree for a while though. Cheers, -- Andreas Gruenbacher SUSE Labs, SUSE LINUX GMBH - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/