Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262953AbVCJSbJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:31:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262913AbVCJSYl (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:24:41 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao08.cox.net ([68.230.241.31]:65530 "EHLO fed1rmmtao08.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262845AbVCJSSa (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:18:30 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:18:09 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: David Woodhouse Cc: Jeff Garzik , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , "David S. Miller" , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel list Subject: Re: bk commits and dates Message-ID: <20050310181809.GX3098@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <1110422519.32556.159.camel@gaston> <20050309194744.6aef66b7.davem@davemloft.net> <1110433821.32524.176.camel@gaston> <422FE571.7010101@pobox.com> <1110463905.4026.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1110463905.4026.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1530 Lines: 32 On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 07:11:45AM -0700, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 01:13 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Speaking strictly in terms of implementation, David Woodhouse's > > bk-commits mailer scripts could probably easily be tweaked to -not- set > > an explicit Date header on the outgoing emails. > > > > It then becomes a matter of deciding whether this is a good idea or not :) > > The original changeset date is also in the body of the mail anyway so it > wouldn't be lost if we changed this. I have no real preference either > way. Bear in mind that the Date: header you got would then be the time > my script ran, not the time it was actually committed. That may differ > by days, in some cases (thankfully not often). I've just been using sort by arrival as an imperfect, but still mostly correct work-around (a few things have shown up after the email with the tag, but only a few). I'd argue having the mails have the fuged date is useful when trying to re-create sub-sets of a given tree. Note that for the specific problem Ben has (looking at all ChangeSets from A to B), I've got a kinda slow script that fakes the bk-commits messages given two repositories, if this sounds of any interest to anyone. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/