Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263261AbVCKKqR (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2005 05:46:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263260AbVCKKqR (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2005 05:46:17 -0500 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:19411 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263261AbVCKKoM (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2005 05:44:12 -0500 Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 02:43:22 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: mingo@elte.hu, rlrevell@joe-job.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.11-rc3-V0.7.38-01 Message-Id: <20050311024322.690eb3a9.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20050204100347.GA13186@elte.hu> <1108789704.8411.9.camel@krustophenia.net> <20050311095747.GA21820@elte.hu> <20050311101740.GA23120@elte.hu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 661 Lines: 16 Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > did you try the canonical way of putting a spinlock into every > > buffer_head? > > > > No, I'll try that now. I just didn't want to modify the buffer head struct > just for journaling. But if it is the quickest and easiest fix, then I'll > submit it and we can change it later. You'll need two spinlocks. jbd_lock_bh_state() and jbd_lock_bh_journal_head(). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/