Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261219AbVCKRZK (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:25:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261218AbVCKRZK (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:25:10 -0500 Received: from smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.11.36]:1468 "HELO smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261219AbVCKRY7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:24:59 -0500 From: Blaisorblade To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/9] UML - Export gcov symbol based on gcc version Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 18:01:29 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 Cc: Adrian Bunk , Jeff Dike , torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200503100216.j2A2G2DN015232@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <20050310225340.GD3205@stusta.de> In-Reply-To: <20050310225340.GD3205@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200503111801.29510.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1740 Lines: 47 On Thursday 10 March 2005 23:53, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 09:16:02PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote: > > The init function called by gcc when gcov is enabled is __gcov_init or > > __bb_init_func, depending on the gcc version. Anton is using 3.3.4 and > > seeing __gcov_init. I'm using 3.3.2 and seeing __bb_init_func, so we > > need to close that gap a bit. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike > > > > Index: linux-2.6.11/arch/um/kernel/gmon_syms.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.11.orig/arch/um/kernel/gmon_syms.c 2005-03-07 > > 10:53:03.000000000 -0500 +++ > > linux-2.6.11/arch/um/kernel/gmon_syms.c 2005-03-07 16:29:37.000000000 > > -0500 @@ -5,8 +5,14 @@ > > > > #include "linux/module.h" > > > > +#if __GNUC__ > 3 || (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ > 3) || \ > > + (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ == 3 && __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ >= 4) > >... > > This patch is still wrong. > > It seems my comment on this [1] was lost: > > <-- snip --> > > This line has to be something like > > ( (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ == 3 && __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ >= 4) && \ > HEAVILY_PATCHED_SUSE_GCC ) > > I hope SuSE has added some #define to distinguish what they call > "gcc 3.3.4" from GNU gcc 3.3.4 "You hope" does not mean "it exists". Secondly, the patch is wrong anyway, as I said elsewhere. -- Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/