Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261288AbVCKSqK (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2005 13:46:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261309AbVCKSor (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2005 13:44:47 -0500 Received: from prgy-npn1.prodigy.com ([207.115.54.37]:2192 "EHLO oddball.prodigy.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261288AbVCKSlI (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2005 13:41:08 -0500 Message-ID: <4231E75A.4090203@tmr.com> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 13:45:46 -0500 From: Bill Davidsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Mackall CC: Pavel Machek , "Marcos D. Marado Torres" , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chrisw@osdl.org, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.11.2 References: <20050309111102.GA30119@elf.ucw.cz><20050309111102.GA30119@elf.ucw.cz> <20050309235716.GZ3163@waste.org> In-Reply-To: <20050309235716.GZ3163@waste.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2069 Lines: 62 Matt Mackall wrote: > On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 12:11:02PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > >>On St 09-03-05 09:52:46, Marcos D. Marado Torres wrote: >> >>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>Hash: SHA1 >>> >>>On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Greg KH wrote: >>> >>> >>>>which is a patch against the 2.6.11.1 release. If consensus arrives >>>>that this patch should be against the 2.6.11 tree, it will be done that >>>>way in the future. >>> >>>IMHO it sould be against 2.6.11 and not 2.6.11.1, like -rc's that are'nt >>>againt >>>the last -rc but against 2.6.x. >> >>You expect people to go through all 2.6.11.1, 2.6.11.2, ... . That >>means .11.2 should be relative to .11.1, because otherwise people will >>have to revert (ugly). And you want people to track -stable kernels as >>fast as possible. > > > There are three ways we can do this: > > a) all 2.6.x.y are diffs against 2.6.x > b) interdiffs for .1, .2, etc. with 2.6.x+1 diffed against 2.6.x > c) interdiffs and 2.6.12 is a diff against 2.6.11.last > > Imagine we want to go from 2.6.11.3 to 2.6.12 > > case a) > revert patch 2.6.11.3 > get and apply 2.6.12 Would anyone actually do that? About the time of the first patch usually do something like: cd linux-2.6.11 cp -rl . ../linux-2.6.11.1 cd $_ bzcat ../Patches/patch-2.6.11.1.bz2 | patch -p1 make oldconfig By doing copy with links for all unchanged files you use virtually no extra space for each revision, and that encourages creating a separate tree for testing patches from -ck, or -ac, or Nick. I use it to compile with various options as well, I usually build test versions for P-II, P-III, P4-HT and Athlon depending on what I'm testing. -- -bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com) "The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the last possible moment - but no longer" -me - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/