Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261744AbVCKTe2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2005 14:34:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261498AbVCKTcQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2005 14:32:16 -0500 Received: from adsl-166-231.38-151.net24.it ([151.38.231.166]:36357 "HELO gateway.milesteg.arr") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261344AbVCKTbH (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2005 14:31:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20050310213917.GW5389@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> References: <422F59E8.2090707@pobox.com> <20050310202548.GV5389@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <4230AE24.602@pobox.com> <20050310213917.GW5389@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@kernel.org, Linux Kernel , Jeff Garzik , Netdev From: Daniele Venzano Subject: Re: [stable] [BK PATCHES] 2.6.x net driver oops fixes Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 20:29:50 +0100 To: Chris Wright X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1529 Lines: 49 On 10/mar/05, at 22:39, Chris Wright wrote: > * Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@pobox.com) wrote: >> Chris Wright wrote: >>> * Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@pobox.com) wrote: >>> >>> >>>> This will update the following files: >>>> >>>> drivers/net/sis900.c | 41 >>>> +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- >>>> drivers/net/via-rhine.c | 3 +++ >>> >>> >>> The via-rhine fix is already in the stable queue. But the sis900 >>> oops >>> fix does not apply to the stable tree. It relies on a few >>> intermediate >>> patches. Appears to still be an issue for the older version which >>> is in >>> 2.6.11. Here's a stab at a backport. Would you like to >>> review/validate >>> or drop this one? >> >> The backport looks correct to me, though it would be nice to get a >> via-rhine owner to ACK the patch before it goes in... > > OK, thanks. ITYM sis900 maintainer, is that still Ollie Lho as listed > in > MAINTAINERS (that's looking old)? I have been acting maintainer for more than a year now, and I'm completely fine with the patch. A lot of time ago (2.6.6) I proposed a patch to update MAINTAINERS, but Jeff said he wanted to wait some time. I don't know if such change is now possible/wanted. AFAIK Ollie's email address bounces. -- Daniele Venzano http://www.brownhat.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/