Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261854AbVCKXoY (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2005 18:44:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261846AbVCKXlW (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2005 18:41:22 -0500 Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:46597 "HELO mailout.stusta.mhn.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261798AbVCKXhY (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2005 18:37:24 -0500 Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 00:37:22 +0100 From: Adrian Bunk To: Jeff Dike Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] UML - Export gcov symbol based on gcc version Message-ID: <20050311233722.GS3723@stusta.de> References: <200503100216.j2A2G2DN015232@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <20050310225340.GD3205@stusta.de> <200503111849.j2BImsJp003370@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <20050311165526.GA3723@stusta.de> <200503112354.j2BNrFJp005237@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200503112354.j2BNrFJp005237@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1534 Lines: 52 On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 06:53:15PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote: > bunk@stusta.de said: > > And therefore you added a patch that helps only those distros at the > > price of breaking other people and distros using sane compilers? > > Didn't you start this thread by pointing out that SuSE has a gcc 3.3.4 > which isn't? I would call that a compiler which lies about its version, and > for the purposes of this argument, I would say that it is not a sane > compiler. I said: <-- snip --> This line has to be something like ( (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ == 3 && __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ >= 4) && \ HEAVILY_PATCHES_SUSE_GCC ) <-- snip --> IOW: Only heavily patches gcc 3.3 compiler define __gcov_init. Anton's original report said that he needs __gcov_init with SuSE gcc 3.3.4 . > Given this, your original (correct) claim was that my patch would not help > such compilers. Are you now claiming that it does help such compilers, and > no one else? No, my claim is that no sane gcc 3.3 defines __gcov_init. > Jeff cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/