Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261542AbVCLA0i (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:26:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261798AbVCLA0i (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:26:38 -0500 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:53481 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261542AbVCLA0e (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:26:34 -0500 Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:23:20 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Adam Belay Cc: bunk@stusta.de, perex@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/pnp/: possible cleanups Message-Id: <20050311162320.15007aa3.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <1110585763.12485.223.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20050311181606.GC3723@stusta.de> <1110585763.12485.223.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-vine-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 685 Lines: 18 Adam Belay wrote: > > This patch essential makes it impossible for PnP protocols to be > modules. Currently, they are all in-kernel. If that is acceptable..., > then this patch looks fine to me. Any comments? You're the maintainer... If someone converts a protocol to be moduar, presumably they will re-add the needed exports to support that. Are there likely to be any out-of-tree modular protocols in existence? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/