Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261792AbVCLArv (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:47:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261818AbVCLArv (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:47:51 -0500 Received: from peabody.ximian.com ([130.57.169.10]:9401 "EHLO peabody.ximian.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261792AbVCLArs (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:47:48 -0500 Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/pnp/: possible cleanups From: Adam Belay To: Andrew Morton Cc: bunk@stusta.de, perex@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20050311162320.15007aa3.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20050311181606.GC3723@stusta.de> <1110585763.12485.223.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050311162320.15007aa3.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:44:56 -0500 Message-Id: <1110588297.12485.251.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1659 Lines: 49 On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 16:23 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Adam Belay wrote: > > > > This patch essential makes it impossible for PnP protocols to be > > modules. Currently, they are all in-kernel. If that is acceptable..., > > then this patch looks fine to me. Any comments? > > You're the maintainer... I've been holding off on making many changes to PnP at the moment, because I have been considering replacing it with a new (more modern and ACPI capable) ISA/LPC bridge driver. This work would likely begin after my PCI bridge driver rewrite is finished and merged (as the PCI work is in some ways a prerequisite). http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=111023821617705&w=2 Still, if there are changes to fix actual bugs, then I'm all for them. Also a few features could be added. Specifically PnPBIOS hotplug/docking station support. If anyone's interested, I may implement it (and it would use some functions that were removed by this patch). Furthermore, ISAPnP could be made a module. PnPBIOS probably couldn't. > > If someone converts a protocol to be moduar, presumably they will re-add > the needed exports to support that. Correct. > > Are there likely to be any out-of-tree modular protocols in existence? > Not that I'm aware of. So in short, I'd rather not remove them, because they take away from the original design of the PnP layer. Thanks, Adam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/