Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 06:03:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 06:03:43 -0400 Received: from rhenium.btinternet.com ([194.73.73.93]:50423 "EHLO rhenium") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 06:03:28 -0400 Reply-To: From: "Laramie Leavitt" To: "David Balazic" , , Subject: RE: Switching Kernels without Rebooting? Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 11:08:02 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <3B4C21DA.5FFCBE2@uni-mb.si> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > This is not a problem at all, because UNIX does not guarantee that > a process will get at least one CPU slice every X seconds. > ( read : UNIX is not a real time system ) > > soft-suspend "freezes" processes for several hours anyway ... > > Note that there is a patch for hot replacing a kernel, which is equivalent > to rebooting, but much faster : > Two Kernel Monte (Linux loading Linux on x86) > http://www.scyld.com/products/beowulf/software/monte.html > So if the Two Kernel Monte patch was combined with the system suspend/resume in swap patch then you add some transitions so that the code path does this: 1- Suspend->Monte 2- Monte->Load new Kernel 3- Load->Resume. If it was just for very similar kernels, i.e. most -pre and -ac kernels it would probably work fine. If not, then you could just do the Monte route. Laramie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/