Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262045AbVCLXPL (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Mar 2005 18:15:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262052AbVCLXPL (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Mar 2005 18:15:11 -0500 Received: from zeus.kernel.org ([204.152.189.113]:16054 "EHLO zeus.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262045AbVCLXPF (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Mar 2005 18:15:05 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=qh078KB9Makz8tRBXVcVQqd/bs96/hy3fhc4G2EKbuRbVzz5zFxnrn+Sx2sHbDfIzsPev6GDyP05N200iGl5/ZR7WUROAqhJGGm52yQ8pvVA8768ffIxOSUlfq9GC+UXBMx8QSPPhgISMk6Hrjpa2jK7xdldiGo+K5kwb7aIwPk= Message-ID: <21d7e9970503121513113ecb81@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 10:13:49 +1100 From: Dave Airlie Reply-To: Dave Airlie To: Andrew Morton , Dave Airlie , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: DRI breakage, 2.6.11-mm[123] In-Reply-To: <6uu0ng7je7.fsf@zork.zork.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050312034222.12a264c4.akpm@osdl.org> <6uzmx87k48.fsf@zork.zork.net> <6uu0ng7je7.fsf@zork.zork.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1047 Lines: 25 On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 19:29:20 +0000, Sean Neakums wrote: > Sean Neakums writes: > > > The following happens with 2.6.11-mm[123]. (I didn't have time to > > investigate earlier; sorry.) It does not happen with 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 > > and 2.6.11. I have tested 2.6.11-mm3 with dri disabled (by not > > loading X's dri module) and it also does not happen then. > > Also happens on 2.6.11-mm3 with bk-drm.patch reverted. > > To expand on my crappy report, the graphics card is a Radeon 9200: Wierd the -mm tree has currently very few drm changes over the non-mm tree and if reverting bk-drm doesn't help it sounds like something in the generic ioctl code may be gone wrong... Can you try a 2.6.12-bk snapshot.. it may be the multi-head patches are buggy.... Dave. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/