Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263448AbVCMITV (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Mar 2005 03:19:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263445AbVCMITV (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Mar 2005 03:19:21 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:39046 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263446AbVCMISl (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Mar 2005 03:18:41 -0500 Subject: Re: nvidia fb licensing issue. From: Arjan van de Ven To: Andrew Morton Cc: Dave Jones , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, adaplas@pol.net In-Reply-To: <20050312215936.513039a6.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20050313042459.GF32494@redhat.com> <20050312215936.513039a6.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 09:18:33 +0100 Message-Id: <1110701914.6278.18.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 4.1 (++++) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 2.63 on pentafluge.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (4.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO 1.1 RCVD_IN_DSBL RBL: Received via a relay in list.dsbl.org [] 2.5 RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK RBL: Sent directly from dynamic IP address [80.57.133.107 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS RBL: SORBS: sender is listed in SORBS [80.57.133.107 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1568 Lines: 34 On Sat, 2005-03-12 at 21:59 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Dave Jones wrote: > > > > The nvidia framebuffer code added recently is marked as > > MODULE_LICENSE(GPL), but some things seem a little odd to me.. > > > > 1. The boilerplate at the top of drivers/video/nvidia/nv_dma.h, > > drivers/video/nvidia/nv_local.h, and drivers/video/nvidia/nv_hw.c > > doesn't seem to be a GPL-compatible license. It seems to be an nvidia > > specific license with an advertising clause, and something that > > adds restrictions on rights of U.S. Govt end users. > > > > 2. Some of these files clearly came from XFree86 judging from > > the CVS idents in the source. Was this XFree86 code > > dual-licensed by its original authors ? If so, it isn't clear. > > Does > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11/2.6.11-mm3/broken-out/fbdev-nvidia-licensing-clarification.patch > > clear things up? somewhat; it would even make sense to consider dual licensing that thing (like most other not-originally-gpl code in the kernel) to clarify the legal status for real. Otherwise if you merge it with GPL it sort of becomes GPL only.. (due to the freedom of MIT and the viral nature of GPL) and I suspect the intention of the author was to keep allowing MIT use... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/