Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261199AbVCMMsn (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Mar 2005 07:48:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261204AbVCMMsn (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Mar 2005 07:48:43 -0500 Received: from zork.zork.net ([64.81.246.102]:64673 "EHLO zork.zork.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261199AbVCMMsl (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Mar 2005 07:48:41 -0500 From: Sean Neakums To: Dave Jones Cc: Dave Airlie , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: DRI breakage, 2.6.11-mm[123] References: <20050312034222.12a264c4.akpm@osdl.org> <6uzmx87k48.fsf@zork.zork.net> <6uu0ng7je7.fsf@zork.zork.net> <21d7e9970503121513113ecb81@mail.gmail.com> <20050312235804.GD32494@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Dave Airlie , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 12:48:21 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20050312235804.GD32494@redhat.com> (Dave Jones's message of "Sat, 12 Mar 2005 18:58:04 -0500") Message-ID: <6ull8r7luy.fsf@zork.zork.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: sneakums@zork.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zork.zork.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1507 Lines: 37 Dave Jones writes: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 10:13:49AM +1100, Dave Airlie wrote: > > On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 19:29:20 +0000, Sean Neakums wrote: > > > Sean Neakums writes: > > > > > > > The following happens with 2.6.11-mm[123]. (I didn't have time to > > > > investigate earlier; sorry.) It does not happen with 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 > > > > and 2.6.11. I have tested 2.6.11-mm3 with dri disabled (by not > > > > loading X's dri module) and it also does not happen then. > > > > > > Also happens on 2.6.11-mm3 with bk-drm.patch reverted. > > > > > > To expand on my crappy report, the graphics card is a Radeon 9200: > > > > Wierd the -mm tree has currently very few drm changes over the non-mm > > tree and if reverting bk-drm doesn't help it sounds like something in > > the generic ioctl code may be gone wrong... > > > > Can you try a 2.6.12-bk snapshot.. it may be the multi-head patches > > are buggy.... > > Could be. Given the other agp problems didn't get spotted in -mm > my confidence in those patches has dropped off somewhat in the > last few days. > > Hopefully it's something simple. Same symptoms with 2.6.11-bk8. -- Dag vijandelijk luchtschip de huismeester is dood - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/