Subject: Re: 2.6.11-mm3: machine check on sleep, PowerBook5.4
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Sean Neakums <sneakums@zork.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
       Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <6uhdjf5hc8.fsf@zork.zork.net>
References: <20050312034222.12a264c4.akpm@osdl.org>
	 <6upsy37o0v.fsf@zork.zork.net> <1110717016.5787.143.camel@gaston>
	 <1110717351.5787.146.camel@gaston> <6uzmx75xiv.fsf@zork.zork.net>
	 <6usm2z5pq3.fsf@zork.zork.net> <1110750834.19810.162.camel@gaston>
	 <6uhdjf5hc8.fsf@zork.zork.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 09:10:06 +1100
Message-Id: <1110751806.14684.167.camel@gaston>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1158
Lines: 31

On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 22:08 +0000, Sean Neakums wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> writes:
> 
> > On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 19:07 +0000, Sean Neakums wrote:
> >> Sean Neakums <sneakums@zork.net> writes:
> >> 
> >> > Both patches give me a successful sleep, although I had to alter the
> >> > second to not #if 0 core99_ata100_enable -- there's another call to
> >> > that function in pmac_feature.c's set_initial_features().
> >> >
> >> > I will try to gather some power numbers.
> >> 
> >> With the first patch, charge dropped by 33 over 52 minutes, 0.64/min.
> >> With the second patch, charge dropped by 65 over 80 minutes, 0.81/min.
> >
> > Hi ! With the same initial charge ? The problem is that the drop isn't
> > really linear...
> 
> Oh, fiddlesticks, that didn't occur to me.  I can redo with overnight
> sleeps on a full charge, if you like.

Yes, I would appreciate, thanks.

Ben.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/