Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 12:19:50 +0100
To: Eric Piel <Eric.Piel@tremplin-utc.net>
Cc: Jan De Luyck <lkml@kcore.org>, davej@redhat.com,
       cpufreq@zenii.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       linux@dominikbrodowski.net
Subject: Re: cpufreq on-demand governor up_treshold?
Message-ID: <20050314111950.GE2298@poupinou.org>
References: <200503140829.04750.lkml@kcore.org> <42354400.7070500@tremplin-utc.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <42354400.7070500@tremplin-utc.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: Bruno Ducrot <ducrot@poupinou.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 736
Lines: 19

On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 08:57:52AM +0100, Eric Piel wrote:
> BTW, DaveJ, Dominik, I couldn't find them in the daily-snapshot 
> available at codemonkey.org.uk. Should I worry, or is it just due to 
> some latency between your private trees and the public one?
> 

This happens those days only when I upgrade the LINUX_2_4 branch
(and only because its easier for me to diff between HEAD and LINUX_2_4).

-- 
Bruno Ducrot

--  Which is worse:  ignorance or apathy?
--  Don't know.  Don't care.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/