Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:56:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:56:21 -0400 Received: from geos.coastside.net ([207.213.212.4]:31723 "EHLO geos.coastside.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:56:08 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 09:47:48 -0700 To: Dave Jones , Hugh Dickins From: Jonathan Lundell Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Discrepancies between /proc/cpuinfo and Dave J's x86info Cc: Jordan , Jordan Breeding , Linux Kernel , , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At 4:28 PM +0200 2001-07-11, Dave Jones wrote: >On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Hugh Dickins wrote: > >> Am I paranoid? > >Probably :) >The Intel CPUs with PSN I've seen simply drop 1 level. >What other CPUs support this feature? ISTR Transmeta had it? >Do they behave the same? > >> I feel nervous about "c->cpuid_level--" inferring >> what we expect to happen to it, would prefer to check it (below). >> + c->cpuid_level = cpuid_eax(0); > >No biggie, either solution is fine with me. HD's version has the advantage of not having to make assumptions about how future CPUs might handle the level, and leaves open the alternative possibility of leaving the level at 3 (or some future 4) and just turning off the serial-number capability. -- /Jonathan Lundell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/