Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262363AbVCOJ6s (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2005 04:58:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262369AbVCOJ6s (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2005 04:58:48 -0500 Received: from [195.144.244.147] ([195.144.244.147]:27808 "EHLO amanaus.varma-el.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262363AbVCOJ6q (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2005 04:58:46 -0500 Message-ID: <4236B1D1.7030707@varma-el.com> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:58:41 +0300 From: Andrey Volkov Organization: Varma Electronics Oy User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RFC: CANbus subsytem for 2.6 kernel (char or netdev) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 583 Lines: 18 Hello, all I look through code of exist CANbus drivers, and have, may be strange, next question: Anyone could told me, why everyone, who wrote CANbus driver (peak, kvaser etc) always use char dev, but not netdev for it? May be exist some global pitfall, which I couldn't see, which prevent to use netdev? -- Regards Andrey Volkov. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/