Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261178AbVCOLwp (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2005 06:52:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261179AbVCOLwp (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2005 06:52:45 -0500 Received: from [195.144.244.147] ([195.144.244.147]:42401 "EHLO amanaus.varma-el.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261178AbVCOLwn (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2005 06:52:43 -0500 Message-ID: <4236CC87.5030401@varma-el.com> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 14:52:39 +0300 From: Andrey Volkov Organization: Varma Electronics Oy User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benedikt Spranger Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: CANbus subsytem for 2.6 kernel (char or netdev) References: <4236B1D1.7030707@varma-el.com> <1110884699.5812.10.camel@atlas.tec.linutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <1110884699.5812.10.camel@atlas.tec.linutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 711 Lines: 23 Hi Benedikt, Yes, thanks, very close to what about I thinking :), but are you measure overhead of netdev (it disturb me)? Andrey Benedikt Spranger wrote: >>Anyone could told me, why everyone, who wrote CANbus driver (peak, >>kvaser etc) always use char dev, but not netdev for it? May be exist >>some global pitfall, which I couldn't see, which prevent to use netdev? > > > Maybe you try out: > http://www.linutronix.de/data/linux-2.6.11-can.diff > > Bene > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/