Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 18:15:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 18:14:45 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:16399 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 18:14:41 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 19:14:39 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Paul Jakma Cc: Helge Hafting , "C. Slater" , Subject: Re: Switching Kernels without Rebooting? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Paul Jakma wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Helge Hafting wrote: > > > That seems completely out of question. The structures a 2.4.7 > > kernel understands might be insufficient to express the setup > > a future 2.6.9 kernel is using to do its stuff better. > > however, it might be handy if say you needed to upgrade a stable > kernel due to a bug fix or security update. One thing which always surprises me in this discussion (it comes up about once a year, it seems) is that nobody participating in this discussion ever starts writing any code for it. Is this a feature which is only wanted by people who don't want to code, or is this just a signal that the amount of trouble involved just isn't worth it? Rik -- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/