Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 18:39:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 18:38:54 -0400 Received: from roc-24-169-102-121.rochester.rr.com ([24.169.102.121]:56594 "EHLO roc-24-169-102-121.rochester.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 18:38:44 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 18:37:45 -0400 From: Chris Mason To: Rik van Riel , Andreas Dilger cc: Shawn Veader , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: disk full or not? you decide... Message-ID: <264310000.994891065@tiny> In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, July 11, 2001 07:10:27 PM -0300 Rik van Riel wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Andreas Dilger wrote: > >> Note also that on reiserfs, if you have such a process which keeps >> files open after they are deleted and then you have a crash, the file >> is "orphaned" and the space is "lost" until you run reiserfsck again. >> It may be that Chris Mason's patch for this is in the latest kernels, >> but it may not be, and it might not be in the kernel you are running. > > Chris, Hans, is this problem still in the reiserfs > in the current kernel or has it already been fixed ? Vladimir Saveliev has a patch that is doing well in internal testing. I had wanted to intergrate it some nested transaction stuff, but it didn't have the same advantages as it did under 2.2.x. They will probably send it out for wider testing very soon. Just to clarify, you need to have a crash or unclean un -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/