Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262727AbVCPSbv (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:31:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262728AbVCPSbv (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:31:51 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:47293 "EHLO parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262727AbVCPSbu (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:31:50 -0500 Message-ID: <42387B89.8@pobox.com> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:31:37 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040922 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Gerst CC: Kernel Mailing List , Greg KH , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: BK snapshots broken References: <4238487F.5050708@didntduck.org> In-Reply-To: <4238487F.5050708@didntduck.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 733 Lines: 19 Brian Gerst wrote: > The snapshots on kernel.org are being created from the most recent tag > in the BK repo, which is 2.6.11.3. That means they are missing all of > the changesets between the 2.6.11 and 2.6.11.3 tags, and don't apply to > a clean 2.6.11 tree. This is my fault, but I won't have a chance to fix for a day or two. The BK snapshot script finds the latest kernel version by looking at the BK tag. It should probably look directly at the Makefile, I suppose. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/