Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261950AbVCQQdg (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Mar 2005 11:33:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262001AbVCQQdf (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Mar 2005 11:33:35 -0500 Received: from viper.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.4]:57305 "HELO viper.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261950AbVCQQdY (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Mar 2005 11:33:24 -0500 Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.11-rc3-V0.7.38-01 From: Lee Revell To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <1108845942.10705.27.camel@krustophenia.net> References: <20050204100347.GA13186@elte.hu> <1108789704.8411.9.camel@krustophenia.net> <20050219090036.GA30456@elte.hu> <20050219090312.GA30513@elte.hu> <1108845942.10705.27.camel@krustophenia.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 11:33:22 -0500 Message-Id: <1111077203.23171.23.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1762 Lines: 46 On Sat, 2005-02-19 at 15:45 -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > On Sat, 2005-02-19 at 10:03 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > Testing on an all SCSI 1.3Ghz Athlon XP system, I am seeing very long > > > > latencies in the journalling code with 2.6.11-rc4-RT-V0.7.39-02. > > > > > > could you send me the full trace? > > > > just in case the system in question is still running - could you also do > > a 'verbose' trace via: > > > > echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/trace_verbose > > OK, here is a 2912us verbose latency trace with "data=ordered", gzipped. > dbench 32 or 64 is the easiest way to trigger these. > > I have not tried "data=journal". As previously stated "data=writeback" > works perfectly - I ran JACK overnight while stressing the fs and did > not get one xrun. Any update on this? The problem is still apparent in 2.6.11. It seems to be a regression from 2.6.10. And now I've heard 2.6.12-rc1 mentioned with no motion on this. Here's the trace again in case you missed it: http://www.alsa-project.org/~rlrevell/2912us The "latency regressions" thread was all sub-millisecond stuff which can be ignored IMHO. Still interesting because they are regressions after all, but not a real world problem. However this one can be several milliseconds. It's a real problem. I'd hate to have to ship 2.6.12 with a disclaimer that ext3 with "data=ordered" is not suitable for the desktop (as it clearly violates the stated desktop responsiveness goal of 1ms). Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/