Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261608AbVCROI7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Mar 2005 09:08:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261609AbVCROI7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Mar 2005 09:08:59 -0500 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.197]:32169 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261608AbVCROIs (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Mar 2005 09:08:48 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=b+mz8cigzARXXrELZ09h0DM2ZysT8h7n5f8cmOBMpiOJrKqQ5Pxt7C6AZefnoyTyhdrvrbQs6sfnOo2m+WSxzEtQxU1ocMedVrN/NvjR7K3Rqv5DkZ7aYHtLiUSI3hce1BCj+PVuT4bSXsblQcqeXOFOWF9UaNzRBGiaOQvceCI= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 19:38:45 +0530 From: Imanpreet Arora Reply-To: Imanpreet Arora To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Question on Scheduler activations Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 724 Lines: 26 Hello, I came across http://people.redhat.com/drepper/glibcthreads.html It seems to arouse a bit of confusion. _FIRST_ it says that scheduler activations are BAD. Then it delves on the possible implementation of Scheduler activations in Linux. Though I know that scheduler activations are not part of the present kernel. Could anyone provide BOTH the short and long answer to a) If they were ever implemented? b) Reasons for rejection? TIA -- Imanpreet Singh Arora - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/