Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262446AbVCSLdc (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Mar 2005 06:33:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262449AbVCSLdc (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Mar 2005 06:33:32 -0500 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:46221 "EHLO ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262446AbVCSLd1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Mar 2005 06:33:27 -0500 To: Albert Cahalan Cc: linux-kernel mailing list , diegocg@gmail.com, lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca, riel@redhat.com, nigelenki@comcast.net Subject: Re: binary drivers and development References: <1110517070.1949.60.camel@cube> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: 19 Mar 2005 04:29:54 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1110517070.1949.60.camel@cube> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1498 Lines: 32 Albert Cahalan writes: > Lennart Sorensen writes: > > > You forgot the very important: > > - Only works on architecture it was compiled for. So anyone not > > using i386 (and maybe later x86-64) is simply out of luck. What do > > nvidia users that want accelerated nvidia drivers for X DRI do > > right now if they have a powerpc or a sparc or an alpha? How about > > porting Linux to a new architecture. With binary drivers you now > > start out with no drivers on the new architecture except for the > > ones you have source for. Not very productive. > > Rik van Riel writes: > > > No, it wouldn't. I can use a source code driver on x86, > > x86-64 and PPC64 systems, but a binary driver is only > > usable on the architecture it was compiled for. > > > > Source code is way more portable than binary anything. > > The kernel already has an AML interpreter for ACPI. **duck** > > As for portability, AML would do the job. It beats typical > vendor source code IMHO, because endianness and integer size > are well-defined. (like the Java VM and .net) Last I looked the kernel implemented opcodes that were not in the ACPI spec. So I would go with defined, but not well defined. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/