Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262071AbVCTJvt (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Mar 2005 04:51:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262063AbVCTJvt (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Mar 2005 04:51:49 -0500 Received: from linux01.gwdg.de ([134.76.13.21]:29336 "EHLO linux01.gwdg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262075AbVCTJvn (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Mar 2005 04:51:43 -0500 Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 10:51:41 +0100 (MET) From: Jan Engelhardt cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] disable builtin modules In-Reply-To: <20050319230648.19238.42743.71351@clementine.local> Message-ID: References: <20050319230648.19238.42743.71351@clementine.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 720 Lines: 20 >This patch makes it possible to disable built in code from the kernel >command line. The patch is rather simple - it extends the compiled-in case >of module_init() to include __setup() with a name based on KBUILD_MODNAME. What if there is already an option like the modname? I do not know of any code that currently does so, but you never know. Are acpi= and apm= already what your patch wants to extend to other modules? If not, there's conflict. Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/